“THUS SAITH THE LORD!”
Isaiah 8:20
Historically, that which has distinguished Baptists
from both papists and protestants is the fact that we
believe and preach only that which is plainly revealed in Holy Scripture. We
are glad to know that our doctrine and practices are supported by history, but
we believe nothing and practice nothing simply because others have done so in
history. We are delighted with the knowledge that our doctrine and ordinances
are logical and reasonable, but we do not base any doctrine or practice upon
human logic. We base our faith and our practices as the
We believe the doctrine of the TRINITY because John stated it exactly (I John 5:7). We rejoice in
the FORGIVENESS OF SIN because it is
written out plainly in the Word of God (I John 1:9). We declare every
believer’s total FREEDOM FROM THE LAW
because it is written, “We are not under
the law, but under grace” (Rom.
Our
faith stands neither in the wisdom of men, nor in the words of men, no matter
how wise, no matter how great, no matter how many they may
be. Our faith stands in the Word of God alone. I am prepared, if need be, to
stand alone in that faith.
“CAN ANY FORBID WATER THAT
THESE SHOULD NOT BE BAPTIZED?”
Acts
Recently I received an anonymous letter from someone
who vehemently objected to our insistence upon baptism for believers only and
by immersion only. Enclosed with the
letter was an article defending infant baptism. I do not know who the author
is, so I cannot call him by name or cite his references. But what he says in
defense of infant baptism are the very reasons for our objections to the
practice.
He writes, “The children of those who believe are
included in the covenant, and
Should any ask why we forbid the
waters of baptism for infants, no greater reasons can be given than the
implications of the statements above: that the infants of believers are born
holy, regenerate, and forgiven; that the blessings of God’s covenant are
inherited by natural generation; and that by baptism “the body of the sins of
the flesh” can be put away. Not only do the Scriptures clearly forbid the
practice of infant baptism, requiring faith before baptism (Acts
WHY DO WE PRACTICE BAPTISM BY IMMERSION
ONLY?
Romans 6:4
Were it not for the insistence of both papists and protestants that infants be “baptized”, there would be no
question about the mode of baptism. The only reason for perverting the
ordinance of Christ into the sprinkling or pouring of water is to accommodate
the practice of infant “baptism”. Our practice of immersing believers is not a
Baptist peculiarity. It is a biblical necessity for the following reasons.
1. THE MEANING
OF THE WORD BAPTIZE - The word “baptize” means “to dip, plunge, or
immerse.” The word never means, and can never with honesty be translated
“sprinkle” or “pour”. Immersion is not a mode of baptism. Immersion is baptism.
Without immersion, baptism has not taken place.
2. THE METHOD
OF BAPTISM IN THE NEW TESTAMENT - How was baptism practiced in the New
Testament? That really should settle the issue for all who wish to honor and
obey the Word of God. Wherever John the Baptist baptized men he required “much
water” (John
Donald S. Fortner, Pastor
Grace Baptist Church of
Danville